• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

SCG Nonprofits

Engage your board with what matters.

  • About
    • Client Comments
    • Cyrus N. White
    • Privacy Notice
  • Ideas
    • Board Training & Development
    • Board Culture & Performance
    • Strategy, Performance, & Risk
  • Connect
  • Show Search
Hide Search

3 Reasons to Extend the Terms of Board Members

By Cyrus White Leave a Comment

Effective board members are precious. There is a cost to having a good director rotate off the board. According to the 2017 BoardSource Leading with Intent survey, 61% of nonprofits have 3-year terms for board members. Most of these (42%) have a limit of two terms. Many boards require that once a director rotates off the board, he or she is not eligible for re-election for a year or more. 

Three-year terms work well for individuals and organizations. For the individual, three years is a reasonable commitment. For the organization, three years allows for a learning curve with plenty of time for in-depth contribution. For both the individual and the organization, three years is long enough to know if the match is a good one, and if not, to allow for a graceful exit.

3 Reasons to Extend the Terms of Board Members

As rare as the need may be, here are three reasons to extend the terms of board members:

A limited number of people care about the mission: Among the non-negotiable criteria for selecting board members is an affinity for the organization’s mission. For some nonprofits, the focus of the mission is very narrow. If there is only a handful of people who care enthusiastically about your work, then that reduces your options for new board members.

Limited access to qualified directors: Some organizations find themselves in locations where the need for services is as great as the population is small. Directors may cycle through more frequently, and the board to be smaller than usual.

The board requires specialized skills that are in short supply: In very rare cases, a board may require specialized skills in one or more of its directors. These skills may not by readily available in the community, so directors that possess them may be asked to stay on for additional terms.

A Word of Caution

Don’t compromise the effectiveness of the board by allowing a board member to serve an unusually long term without real justification. In most cases, even rare skill sets that the board may require are available as needed through consultants or advisory panels.

10-minute Board Discussion

Does our term structure make it easier or more difficult to attract and keep good board members?

 

Image courtesy of iStockphoto.com/Yuri_Arcurs

Disclosure of Material Connection: I have not received any compensation for writing this post. I have no material connection to the brands, products, or services that I have mentioned. I am disclosing this in accordance with the Federal Trade Commission’s 16 CFR, Part 255: “Guides Concerning the Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising.”

Filed Under: Board Culture & Performance, Board Structure & Committees Tagged With: board terms, term limits

Subscriber Premium

Free Guide to Better Board Meetings

Get the free ebook 21 Ways to Lead a Great Board Meeting — and then receive occasional updates selected especially for nonprofit board chairs & CEOs.

Success! Now - check your email to confirm your subscription and receive the downloadable ebook.

There was an error submitting your subscription. Please try again.

We won't send you spam. Unsubscribe at any time. Powered by ConvertKit

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

What matters to you?

Tell us . . .

© 2023 SCG Nonprofits · Permissions Policy · Creative Commons License

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn